Asia Pulp & Paper's Anti-Deforestation Pledge: Sign of a Changing Industry?

Asia Pulp & Paper committed to stop cutting down natural forests in Indonesia. Photo credit: Flickr/netaholic13

Asia Pulp & Paper (APP), one of the world’s largest paper companies, announced earlier this month that it will no longer cut down natural forests in Indonesia and will demand similar commitments from its suppliers. The announcement was received with guarded optimism by Greenpeace, Rainforest Action Network, World Wildlife Fund, and other NGOs who have waged a persistent campaign to change APP’s forest policies.

Indeed, APP’s new policy—which includes sourcing all material from plantation-grown trees, ceasing clearing of carbon-rich peatland, and engaging more with local communities—is significant, both for the business world and forest conservation. APP and its suppliers manage more than 2.5 million hectares of land in Indonesia and produce more than 15 million tons of pulp, paper, and packaging globally every year. Strong action by APP could indicate that the industry is heading for a more sustainable future.

The question is whether APP will follow this positive announcement with action. The company does not have a strong track record, having defaulted on past commitments to end deforestation.

But APP has something else going for it this time around. A rapidly evolving world of improving corporate practices and powerful technology could provide the right enabling environment for APP’s commitment—and others like it—to succeed.

A Changing Business Environment

The forest products industry is changing rapidly, transformed by technological innovations, new corporate practices, and an increasingly savvy consumer base. Some key developments include:

1) Global Supply Chains Under Scrutiny

Gone are the days when companies could buy from suppliers without due diligence. More and more business leaders are recognizing that their supply chains are under constant scrutiny.

APP has experienced this pushback firsthand. Throughout the past decade, more than 100 major companies stopped purchasing from APP on environmental grounds, including Staples, Office Depot, and Disney. With so many customers demanding higher standards and greater transparency, there are strong incentives for companies to be reliable partners and better manage their own supply chains (APP’s new policy also applies to its suppliers in Indonesia and China).

Furthermore, forest products companies face new laws designed to crack down on the trade in illegal timber, such as the U.S. Lacey Act, the European Union Timber Regulation, and the Illegal Logging Prohibition in Australia. In a recent high-profile example, Gibson Guitar faced legal action under the Lacey Act for importing illegal wood into the U.S.

2) “Eyes in the Sky” for Forests

Monitoring has historically been a stumbling block for “no-deforestation” commitments. Companies like APP operate in remote regions, and it can be prohibitively expensive to send teams of auditors deep into the forest to verify companies’ claims. Satellite technology offers a way to monitor forests from afar, but imagery can be expensive, hard to analyze, and out-of-date.

Enter Global Forest Watch 2.0, a near-real-time forest monitoring system to be released this spring by WRI and a host of global partners. This free, easy-to-use platform provides interactive maps of the world’s forests that are updated every 16 days. Systems like GFW 2.0 will allow anyone, anywhere to monitor APP’s progress on its commitments, with tools as basic as a computer and an internet connection.

This transparent and accessible approach to forest monitoring will complement the efforts of Eyes on the Forest in Indonesia and strengthen the work of The Forest Trust, Greenpeace, and other NGOs as they monitor APP’s concessions.

3) Fiber Under the Microscope

A suite of new technologies known as fiber analysis allows companies and watchdog groups to test products for “mixed tropical hardwoods,” or MTH, which typically indicates wood harvested from natural tropical forests. Laboratories use high-powered microscopes and tests to determine the composition of the wood, including whether the paper is made from plantation or wild trees, and in some cases, if it contains endangered or protected species.

Fiber analysis has been used and promoted by groups like Greenpeace, Rainforest Action Network, and World Wildlife Fund to monitor supply chains. Now, companies are sending their own samples to labs to verify the wood content in their papers. As the practice grows, APP can expect that its products will be rigorously tested.

Combating Deforestation

The advances in the forest products industry are significant, but more progress needs to be made. The world is still losing forests at a rate of 13 million hectares every year, an area the size of England. In Indonesia, a moratorium on new concessions in natural forests and peatland will expire this year, and it’s is unclear if this important policy will be renewed.

Governments also have an important role to play. On the ground, where APP and its suppliers operate, we need more consistent local law enforcement, as well as better-defined property rights and recognition of local stakeholders’ interests.

The stakes are high: If APP successfully implements its new Forest Conservation Policy, it will build momentum for other companies and governments to adopt reforms. The pledge to the world’s forests has been made—now we must ensure that it is achieved.

5 Comments

Comments expressed on this page are opinions of the authors themselves, and not positions of the World Resources Institute or its partners. WRI reserves the right to remove any comments that it considers inappropriate or spam.

As long as Asia Pulp and

As long as Asia Pulp and Paper can get away from the felling of ramin trees. Ramin trees are found in Sumatra's peat swamp forests, and are critical habitat for the endangered Sumatran tiger. Also, peat swamp forests absorb more carbon than any other forest type. So the felling of ramin trees was very environmentally destructive.

APP and Ramin Forests

APP and Ramin Forests Policy

Thanks for your comment Tim. Ramin are an important group of endangered species and just one of many valuable taxa that would be protected if APP fully implements its new policy, which extends to all natural forest areas. Since Ramin trees grow in natural forests, consumers will be able to test APP’s paper products for Ramin fiber, and determine if the company is keeping its commitment and adhering to international trade laws protecting endangered species. More reading here: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/publications/Campaign-reports....

The article does not mention

The article does not mention that over the last 5 years, APP was banned from the use of the trademarks of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), which does not allow any APP majority-owned company to become FSC-certified and respond to market demand for responsibly produced paper. This triggered some of the negative responses from the market to the supply of APP pulp and paper products.

APP and FSC

APP and FSC Certification

Thanks for the comment Liviu. FSC indeed disassociated from APP in 2007. This was another example of the company failing to meet standards and past commitments. This was driven primarily by NGO campaigns and media coverage of APP’s participation in deforestation, illegal logging and social conflict.

We have to take care off our

We have to take care off our last rainforrests.
For al the animals that live there it is 5 before 12!
Thx to all people wo try to stop it! ;)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is to verify that you are indeed an actual person, and not a spam-bot or other nuisance.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.